Archive for April, 2006

The neutrality of the Internet issue

I am not prevented from drinking Coke or Pepsi or RC Cola. Nothing stops me from shopping at Kroger or Meijer or Wal-mart. I can go to any number of gas stations in town to refuel my vehicle. Truly, the only thing that stops me from going to any given location is based upon my personal preference. For example, I do not go to Wal-mart because I don’t agree with many of their business practices, I drink Pepsi because I think it tastes better than Coke or RC Cola, and I shop around for the best deal for gas, which typically happens to be Kroger.

I certainly would not expect my browsing on the web through the Internet to be limited because the communication company who owns the channels my Internet traffic uses did not get a high enough bid from the site owner.

Supposedly. The issue, it appears, has a couple different stances, much like any given issue.

Where to start? I decided that I would use technocrati to read blogs with “a lot of authority”, as this should help me filter through the bloggers who lept before looking.

I’ve concluded this: I am no where near being done with gathering background about this subject. If so, why did I post this? I felt that it is good to add some more information to the blogosphere, even if it is not original. After all, there is a lot of informed posts out there about this, and I doubt many people choose to research before making a conclusion. I’ll even admit I did this a bit myself. I thought that the e-mail I received via MoveOn.org would be worthwhile, and that I would get some good information about the issue. At the moment, I can’t say for sure if this was the case. Any way, I did some clicking and sent an e-mail to my state representatives. Only after that did I find that I may just be causing more harm then good.

I’m going to have to look at this more this week. Aside from that, enjoy the links, and if anything, educate yourself on the matter.

The Wonderful World of Wikipedia and showing people how to use technology

Meghan had me show Wikipedia to someone last night who typically doesn’t use the web/Internet a lot. Initially, I could tell that the concept of content created and maintained by the users did not go along with what she would typically accept as a reliable source. This had come up because Meghan was explaining that some of her students had been citing for basic information, and she had never heard of it before. I had showed it to Meghan, and she was not only surprised by the breadth of topics that were included, but by the depth of these items as well: images, diagrams, references, citations. Nature compared Wikipedia and Encyclopedia Britannica (as well as posted updates about the research) which can be found here.

I think the biggest thing about this is that by telling and showing people, not just telling them, about technology like this is how you are going to bring technology to the general populace. I said the same thing back in January about Firefox and Thunderbird. You can’t expect the corporations or the government to tell you about every change in technology, unless they can profit, financially or otherwise, from your use of it. That’s just the way things go.

This is something I occasionally fail at. Many moons ago I took my old computer home and set it up for my dad so he had one available to use so he doesn’t “screw up” mom’s. Anyway, I just never got around to showing him how to use it, even though mom said she would. I’m sure that he would enjoy things like Wikipedia, only because he’s an academic at heart. That academic is buried deep within him, but he’s still there. Even mom, who uses web/Internet based technology much more than dad, doesn’t use it that much compared to myself. This is partly because I haven’t shown them; I can’t expect them to just come across it magically. For the record, I should probably state that I don’t use it as much as some other people, but I still consider my use of web/Internet tech to be more than that of the general populace.

Girls charged with playing a real-life version of Super Mario Bros.

This post is not a bomb.

That’s right, Girls attempt real-life version of video game; Residents alarmed; teens could be charged. I first heard of this story from Jacob, one of our student managers. He was skeptical about this, as it was an April 1st online article, and we all know how crazy the Internet gets on that day.

I thought nothing more of it, until I saw this webcomic, which jokes about all the “?” blocks being taken down because they might be bombs, which then prevents Mario from saving the Princess. There was a link at the bottom which lead me to this page, which shows a picture of a box being examined by a firefighter, but also of the use of similar boxes a year earlier as an art project. The art project was done to beautify public areas that advertisers attempt to take over.

Really, I wanted this post to be funny; I truly did. Considering this, you should also be aware that on March 2nd, a student was arrested because of a sticker on his bike. Yes, the sticker did say “This Bike Is A Pipe Bomb”, but, unbeknownst to the police, the sticker is for a punk band in Florida. You would think that, a policeman who say a bike with a sticker such as that, would do some research first. While I know police cruisers have electronics, I doubt they have a full-fledged laptop in there. They could, however, do a simple call back to HQ and say “This is officer Dalton. Could you Google quote This Bike Is A Pipe Bomb end quote for me? It’s a band you say? Thank you.” Done. If someone wanted to make a bike into a pipe bomb, do you think they’d take the time to make a sticker for it?

Where to go with this… this way, I guess.

This article appeared in the April 12th issue of the BG News, the campus newspaper at BGSU. While it allowed them to include all the information about what happened, this news is kind of outdated. If an article was going to be written, it should have been done in mid-March instead of early/mid-April. Then again that’s just me.

While I’m at it, I suppose I should just say, that as an alumni who read the campus newspaper, and now as a member of the campus community as an employee, I believe the campus newspaper should not be a Monday-through-Friday publication, but instead by a Monday-and-Thursday publication. The Monday edition could have a recap of the previous weekend’s events as well as detail anything that would be happening that week. The Thursday edition could have a recap of that week’s events and have information about what is happening that weekend. Done and done. I would feel that this would make the publication better. Then again, that’s just me.

Learning vs. Being Taught

A short post about the act of learning versus the act of being taught.

I was driving on my way back from lunch, and I had caught the beginning of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine before I left the apartment. They had recently encountered an alien of an unknown race whose ship was beginning to fall apart after exiting the nearby wormhole. Using the tractor beam, they targeted and enveloped the sip and started to bring it in, as the tractor beam added stability to the failing ship’s hull. Dax suggested skipping normal first contact procedure, which Sisko agreed with, but he sent O’Brien to the docking bay to greet the alien, as O’Brien did something (I missed this part) that probably saved the alien’s live and would make everything seem less dangerous. As Deep Space Nine is next to a wormhole, it’s not too surprising that an alien of an unknown race would randomly appear. Right before the opening credits began, Sisko wondered out loud what it was that the alien seemed so afraid of.

I considered this on the way out the door. The alien was afraid, so he could be fleeing any number of things, including a repressive government, another hostile of some sort, of participated in an experiment and was surprised to have lived. He could also have banished himself because he carried a sickness and no was going to possibly harm others, or he comes from a culture where they have found themselves to be the only creatures in their galaxy, and encountering someone else was a deep shock.

However, I thought of how this could work as a type of subterfuge. An alien race comes pretending to be on the run from some thing, and in appearing weak, the alien gains the confidence of those who rescued him. The rescuers help him out, and he is able to observe and tell them information in exchange for the help. The information could be offered with no promise of help even. The alien is in reality an operative who is sowing the seeds for a later invasion. This is the way a race of human descendants in an episode of Stargate managed to control earth in an alternate future: we met them, they promised wonderful things, and before the people of Earth knew it, they were headed down a path that they could not leave. These “friends” had extended the life span of the average Earthling to 200 years, but unnoticed went the fact that the people of Earth were becoming sterile. As the health of the Earthlings was being monitored by the aliens because of their advanced medicine, no Earthling was aware. Using the magic of the Stargate, they sent a message into the past to prevent the meeting of the this alien race.

Being given something for free. The alien could lead to it, and the human descended race did it to conquer other races. I’m sure I was aware of the concept when watching the plot unfold in Stargate, or when reading similar scifi stories, such as the farcasters and cruciform in the Hyperion series by Dan Simmons. Despite that, I did not give the concept much thought until now.

It’s like the old saying “Give a man a fish, he eats for a day. Teach a man to fish, he eats for a lifetime.” While that’s true, you need to consider that phrase, as I think it should read differently. This puts the burden of responsibility on the teacher, whereas it should probably be split evenly between the teacher and the student. So, if you consider assisting someone with a problem, remember the above quote, but if you are the one who needs the help, perhaps “Ask for a fish, you eat for one day. Ask to be taught how to fish, you can feed yourself for a lifetime.”

Placing the responsibility of learning a skill on the teacher allows for the teacher (i.e., the educated) to repress or control those they do not feel deserve the knowledge, as well as makes the teacher/educated feel better than the students. A student would then possibly not understand some of the fundamental basics, but simply accept them as fact.

This is the difference between going into any experience and expecting to learn something and expecting to be taught something. If you are learning something, you are taking an active role in the process, possibly forcing the teacher to give you what you want, whereas if you are being taught something, you expect that everything you need to know will be given to you and that is all you need. What you won’t get from being taught something are the heuristics you might otherwise develop which you would need to solve problems when they occur later. By being taught, you aren’t building an understanding of the subject, but you are simply acquiring the results of someone else’s learning.

I think that’s why it’s called the “learning process” and not the “being taught process”. The sooner you realize that, the better.

I know when I first had to go on a malware appointment for work, I had went out and found things I would need to look for and talked to people who had done them to get an understanding of what they saw and did. However, I was actively searching for the information, and then I applied that and saw why others had done certain things. From this, I also learned tricks for dealing with malware threats that I encountered later. Now, here is the issue. For work, I’ve had to try and pass this information down to our student staff, typically through a training session. Not everyone that was there was attempting to learn what they needed to do; they were there to be taught, and I believe that the ones who were there to learn got more out of it. One staff member, after training, felt that she needed assistance with making sure she understood everything, and I went with her on some appointments to go over what needed to be done and why. I feel that following this, she preformed much better than she otherwise would have. The reason for this increase in performance: she wanted to learn.

So, what am I getting at, what’s the point of this? I thought about it, and I realized that I want to learn things, but I also want others to appreciate the act of learning and not expect the act of being taught. I think this is something that people need to consider. Look out into the future; that great unknown that awaits us. If the majority of our people are being taught and are not learning, we are heading for trouble. By “our people”, I don’t mean those of the United States, but the people of the world.

Link-o-rama

Here are some random items of the moment:

  • Fuck the colorblind - I really want to get this shirt, because then I could wear it and be confused as to why people say it’s offensive. True, I know by the title of the shirt what it might say, but that’s only an assumption, as I can’t tell otherwise. The other thing would be to say “my best friend gave it to me”.
  • Lasers! - These lasers have visible beams, and, depending on the model (i.e., how much are you willing to spend), you could (a) burn holes in trash bags (2) heal small wounds (c) ignite wood/matches (IV) pop ballons or even (5) melt plastic. These are definitely lasers you don’t want to shine in someone’s eyes. I want one so bad, but they are rather expensive, and really, it would just be a toy because I have no real application for it. Yet…
  • Defensive field for tanks to disable RPGs and similar weapons - Between this invention and the laser I just mentioned, why isn’t the field of war a much different place?



Bad Behavior has blocked 302 access attempts in the last 7 days.